In the majority opinion on the US Supreme Court's ruling on Trump vs. Casa, Inc., more commonly known as the 'case that entailed nationwide injunctions,' Justice Amy Coney-Barnett annihilated "justice" Brown-Jackson's reputation, stating that
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which
is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent,
not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this:
JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em-
Justices need to be both competent and unbiased. A "justice" who is either too incompetent to read the Constitution and Case Law, too politically tainted to interpret the law with objectivity, or both, needs to be impeached. Impeachment proceedings for "justice" Brown-Jackson need to start right away.
Brazil does have a constitution that explicitly protects artistic freedom of expression. Yet comedian Leo Lins was convicted to eight years in prison for posting a standup of his. According to the court, the comedian "promoted verbal violence" and "foments intolerance" and the "Constitution does not provide a free pass to commit crimes and cannot be used as a justification for hate speech:"
The even more worrisome aspect of this verdict, though, is that it clearly illustrates that ideologically captured courts will not respect the Constitution as the most fundamental piece of legislation, but will resort to texts of lower authority and simply override the stipulations in the Constitution as they deem fit.
Brazil is presently living in a state of tyranny by the judicial. Other Western countries must do everything to avert getting there, which can only be accomplished through a balance of the powers, which includes impeachment of rogue justices.
Here is an interview of a Brazilian feminist who may face up to 25 years in prison for stating that a Federal Deputy who was declared male at birth, is a man:
At the same time, this illustrates that (i) Brazil is a tyranny of the judicial, rather than a democracy, because its own Supreme Court does not respect the Constitution and (ii) that toxic transgenderism is an absolutely corrosive scourge that needs to be removed from society entirely, before it corrupts any common sense, dialogue or progress.
In the latest infamous Supreme Court hearing, "justice" Brown-Jackson outed herself in favour of having "technocrat" agencies that cannot be controlled by the President. The question then becomes whom such agencies would really answer to:
Even though we reported several times before on the lack of understanding of the Constitution Brown-Jackson has, each time seems to surpass the previous one. Impeachment can really be the only way forward for her, before we end up in an unconstutional tyranny of the judicial.
This latest bout of Brown-Jackson's bluntness exposes another deep rot though: there still is a blatant disdain by certain "elites" for ordinary citizens and a desire to reduce the people's influence by making elections irrelevant. Shielded behind a rampart of arrogance, the blobs want to rule the people in spite of their own lack of decency, common sense or any achievement that truly furthers society.
If Brown-Jackson's blob get their way, the United States will end up being a copy of the morally bankrupt European union, which readily destroys its own economy in the name of 'saving the planet,' offers its citizens on the altar of jihad in the name of 'multiculturalism' and nullifies elections in the name of 'saving democracy.' The latter is to be interpreted as: 'save the rule by "elites" through institutions that were once democratically created.'
If the European Union has taught the world any lesson, than that lesson is that rule by an invisible and unaccountable blob of "technocrats" is one of the worst possible forms of government ever created and it is a sure path to self-destruction.
In the majority opinion on the US Supreme Court's ruling on Trump vs. Casa, Inc., more commonly known as the 'case that entailed nationwide injunctions,' Justice Amy Coney-Barnett annihilated "justice" Brown-Jackson's reputation, stating that
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which
is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent,
not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this:
JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em-
bracing an imperial Judiciary."
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf
Justices need to be both competent and unbiased. A "justice" who is either too incompetent to read the Constitution and Case Law, too politically tainted to interpret the law with objectivity, or both, needs to be impeached. Impeachment proceedings for "justice" Brown-Jackson need to start right away.
Brazil does have a constitution that explicitly protects artistic freedom of expression. Yet comedian Leo Lins was convicted to eight years in prison for posting a standup of his. According to the court, the comedian "promoted verbal violence" and "foments intolerance" and the "Constitution does not provide a free pass to commit crimes and cannot be used as a justification for hate speech:"
https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2025/06/03/leo-lins-e-condenado-a-oito-anos-de-prisao-por-publicar-conteudo-preconceituoso-e-discriminatorio-contra-minorias.ghtml
What is verbal violence? As I have outlined before, a stick can hurt me, but overhearing your conversation cannot:
https://www.wildhorsewisdom.xyz/p/a-stick-can-hurt-me?r=31a4ti&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
The even more worrisome aspect of this verdict, though, is that it clearly illustrates that ideologically captured courts will not respect the Constitution as the most fundamental piece of legislation, but will resort to texts of lower authority and simply override the stipulations in the Constitution as they deem fit.
Brazil is presently living in a state of tyranny by the judicial. Other Western countries must do everything to avert getting there, which can only be accomplished through a balance of the powers, which includes impeachment of rogue justices.
Here is an interview of a Brazilian feminist who may face up to 25 years in prison for stating that a Federal Deputy who was declared male at birth, is a man:
https://www.public.news/p/this-feminist-could-spend-25-years?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=uhcpo&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
At the same time, this illustrates that (i) Brazil is a tyranny of the judicial, rather than a democracy, because its own Supreme Court does not respect the Constitution and (ii) that toxic transgenderism is an absolutely corrosive scourge that needs to be removed from society entirely, before it corrupts any common sense, dialogue or progress.
In the latest infamous Supreme Court hearing, "justice" Brown-Jackson outed herself in favour of having "technocrat" agencies that cannot be controlled by the President. The question then becomes whom such agencies would really answer to:
https://www.racket.news/p/justice-kentanji-brown-jacksons-blunt
Even though we reported several times before on the lack of understanding of the Constitution Brown-Jackson has, each time seems to surpass the previous one. Impeachment can really be the only way forward for her, before we end up in an unconstutional tyranny of the judicial.
This latest bout of Brown-Jackson's bluntness exposes another deep rot though: there still is a blatant disdain by certain "elites" for ordinary citizens and a desire to reduce the people's influence by making elections irrelevant. Shielded behind a rampart of arrogance, the blobs want to rule the people in spite of their own lack of decency, common sense or any achievement that truly furthers society.
If Brown-Jackson's blob get their way, the United States will end up being a copy of the morally bankrupt European union, which readily destroys its own economy in the name of 'saving the planet,' offers its citizens on the altar of jihad in the name of 'multiculturalism' and nullifies elections in the name of 'saving democracy.' The latter is to be interpreted as: 'save the rule by "elites" through institutions that were once democratically created.'
If the European Union has taught the world any lesson, than that lesson is that rule by an invisible and unaccountable blob of "technocrats" is one of the worst possible forms of government ever created and it is a sure path to self-destruction.